商务英语专业英文简历表格

商务英语专业英文简历表格（共8篇）

商务英语专业英文简历表格 篇1

商务专业学生英文简历表格模板

商务英语专业英文简历表格 篇2

With entering the information age, we are urgently required to possess a valuable wealth—learning autonomy.Learning autonomy means that it is not the end of our school education as we step out of the door of school education, but a new start of new educationlife-long autonomous learning.On the other hand, during shool education, it is impossible to obtain every knowledge from teachers in class.There is no exception to the autonomy of learning English.Therefore, autonomous learning of English for college students majoring in English matters a lot.

However, in the department of foreign languages in Ding xi Teachers College, the autonomy of freshmen in learning English is not optimistic.Through making a questionnaire, I find that most of them lack of autonomy in English learning.If their teachers don’t arrange assignments, they even seldom read their course books.In class, most of them are unwilling to speak English actively;outside of class, they seldom create opportunities to learn English, or even they come across some chances, they seldom make full use of them.

The problems mentioned above are caused by many factors.In my opinion, the

reason why a lot of college students choose English as their major is not because of their interest, but because of their employment in future.I surveyed 123 first-year English majors from Class1, 2, 3, 4, in our department.The answers of 77 students can be used to analyze the questionnaire.When No 4 question“I think learning English is fun and full of exploration, the more I learn, the more interested I will be.”was asked, Only 5 students chose“5 (completely true) ”, 19 students chose“4 (usually true) ”, accounting for 31%.While No 7 question“I think my grades of English examinations have to do with my employment.”was asked, 35 students chose“5 (complete true) ”, 24 students chose“4 (usually true) ”, accounting for 74%.Thus, they study English very passively.They study English, most of time, just for examinations.

Therefore, the level of English major freshmen’s autonomy in English learning in our school is low, and it is hypothesized that the level of autonomy relates to learning achievement.

Therefore, my research general objective is to make a survey of English major freshmen’s autonomy in English learning.

Specific objectives are to find how high is the level of the autonomy of English major freshmen in English learning;how the level of autonomy relates to learning achievement;what the differences in the level of autonomy between female students and male students are.It is hypothesized that the level of autonomy relates to learning achievement.I surveyed 123 first-year English majors from Class1, 2, 3, 4 in our school.The survey lasted 3 weeks.The survey was conducted through interview, classroom observation and questionnaire.The survey showed that the level of autonomy in English is low and significantly correlated to academic performance.In general, there is no significant difference between male and female students, but in motivation female students are higher.

As far as I know, there are quite a few books, papers and conference presentations dealing with autonomous learning.They are, namely, Establishing Self-Access From Theory to Practice by Dickinson.L, Learner Autonomy in Practice by Little.D., Learner Autonomy and the Need for Learner Training by Mcdevitt, Autonomy and Foreign Language Learning by Holec.H.However all the books are simply an introduction to the western theory and practice in autonomous learning, few applying to the typical Chinese educational context, let alone the Foreign Language Department of Ding xi Teachers College, I know all teachers learn that most students do not like to study, but few teachers pay much attention to the cultivation of English major freshmen’s autonomy and enhance them.So I made a survey of English major Freshmen’s autonomy in learning English

2 Autonomous Learning

2.1 Definition of autonomous learning

The definitions of autonomous learning are of variety, different researchers focusing on different aspects share different concept of it.Debates about the acquirement of“life-long-learning”skills and development of independent thinkers rose in the 1960s, when the concept of autonomous learning emerged.Holec, Henri is an advocator and pioneer of autonomous learning in language learning.His definition is, “The autonomous language learner takes responsibility for the totality of his learning situation.” (Holec, 1979) .

Brain Kenny (1993) defined autonomous learning in this way-autonomous learning creates opportunities for the learners to generate knowledge”.

Cotterall (2000:109) argues that autonomous learning is supposed to be viewed as an essential objective of all learning and should include such aspects of language learning process setting objectives, selecting learning strategies, and evaluating progress.

The above definitions define the autonomous learning from different aspects.I will give my definition from another angle.In my own opinion, learning autonomy is not only a capacity to learn efficiently, but also, and what is more important, an excellent habit we can carefully foster through a long time, with which we can learn efficiently and learn lifelong time with fun, with our good qualities, like positive attitude of life, determination, perseverance, persistence and so on.

2.2 Characteristics of autonomous learning

According to my definition of autonomous learning and research of Norman, Little, and other scholars, the characteristics of autonomous learning in English teaching and learning, in my opinion, are as following:

1) Time-consuming When it comes to fostering and shaping the helpful habit-learning autonomy, Rome is not built in one day.That is really the case.Like all habits, good or bad, they are not shaped in a moment.

2) Correlation with good personal qualities.If we want to shape the habit-learning autonomy, we first should pay attention to fostering our good personalities.However hard and bored at the beginning, we should have a strong will, be determined, persisted until it is a habit without which you feel empty in your heart.Its shaping is closely associated with good personal qualities.

3) Stability Once the habit of autonomous learning is shaped, it is relatively stable, it can go a long way, sometimes for some body lasts lifelong.

4) Relativity Different person shares different personalities, which affects the degrees of autonomy.like what Noman (997:193) states, the fully autonomous learner is an ideal rather than a reality.Therefore, there are different degrees of autonomy.

5) Effectiveness and fun When the habit is shaped, we will take learning as a habit, it can help us to study effectively.Language is acquired most effectively when we are directly involved in accomplishing something, and then we will have a personal interest in the outcome of what we are using the language to do, we will feel fun to learn English.

2.3 Theoretical background

Autonomous language learning approach was founded on the basis of Constructivism, Linguistic basis.

2.3.1 Constructivism

Piaget (Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy.ELT Journal, 49/3, 219-227) stated individuals were actively involved right from birth in constructing personal meaning, which was their own personal understanding, from their experience.From his theory, we know the learner is the main role in learning and teaching.Learners take active responsibility for their own learning, engaged in formulating hypotheses to explore the rules of the target language.It is important for language teachers to help and encourage students in this process, rather than consider them as passive receivers.

George Kelly (Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy.ELT Journal, 49/3, 219-227) , stated his idea in his personalconstruct theory.He began with the premise of‘man-as-scientist’, constantly sought to make sense of his world.People carry out their own personal experiments, construct hypotheses actively seek to confirm or disconfirm them.According to him, language is not learned by the mere memorization of discrete items of grammar, discourse, function or other aspects of language.Instead, learners are involved in an active process of making sense.As language teachers, we should take advantage of a variety of ways to get students involved in learning and construct their own understanding of the language.It is more important to teach them how to learn than to give them knowledge only.

2.3.2 Linguistic basis

Chomsky (Learning as dialogue:the dependence of learner autonomy on teacher autonomy system 23/2, 175-181) claimed that human beings are biologically endowed with an innate language faculty.The innate language faculty incorporates a set of universal grammatical principles (UG) .If students learn a few words, they have an ability to creatively use the language to express their ideas.He emphasized the importance of innate knowledge and the learner’s contribution to the process of language learning.

Krashen’s affective filter hypothesis deals with how affective factors related to SLA.In his view, the filter controls how much input the learner comes into contract with, and how much input is converted into intake.It is effective because the factors, which determine its strength, have to do with the learner’s motivation, selfconfidence, and with low anxiety have low filters, and so obtain and let in plenty of input.For language learners, it is important to be aware of the fact that whatever language input is provided in classrooms, teachers should give students effective input and create lively atmosphere.They should give students more practice and make them the host of the class.

3 A Survey on Learner Autonomy

3.1 Research purpose and research questions

The above gives a definition of autonomous learning of my understanding and its characteristics.But it hasn’t made clear how learners act in real study.I want to know the level of the autonomous learning in real life in order to find causes of influencing autonomy of freshmen majoring in English.The survey tries to answer the following questions:

1.In terms of English major freshmen, how high is the level of autonomy in English learning?

2.How is the level of autonomy related to learning achievement?

3.What are the differences in the level of autonomy between female and male students?

3.2 Methods

3.2.1 Classroom observation

In Chinese language classes, students attach much importance to classroom learning activities, so their performances in the classroom reflect some of their learning habits and learning strategies.I observed 4 English classes (Class1, 2, 3, 4) .My observations aimed to identify how they learn.I wanted to get some useful information about how the students act in the classroom.

3.2.2 Interview

In order to get useful information about how students learn English in the class and outside, I conducted several interviews.Two groups of the interviewees were selected according to their achievements.One group came from the students who get high scores on the English section of their University Entrance Examination and could communicate fluently in class.The others scored lower and were unwilling to speak English in the classroom.I paid attention to the following points in the process of the interviewing.

a.During the interview, I speak to them in English as clearly as possible.I tried to make the students feel relaxed.In this way, they could express their real ideas.

b.The questions asked in the interviews were related to their learning in the classroom and outside.

3.2.3 Questionnaire

The questionnaire used in the survey which was designed by referring to HKBU Papers in (Applied Language Studies, 4, 64-79) was designed and expected to measure the level of autonomy.It was conducted on the basis of the definition of autonomous learning.The questionnaire contains two sections.Section 1 was on background information, including name, sex, and the scores on the English section of their University Entrance Examination.Section 2 consists of 58 items belonging to the following 6 categories:learning motivation, learning content, goal-setting and plan, learning strategy, assessment, and learning help.Each item was on a five-point scale ranging from 1“this statement is never or almost never true of me”to 5“this statement is always true of me”.The questionnaire was written in Chinese so that the students have no difficulty in understanding them.

Item 1-10 is used for testing motivation, item 11-20 for resource, item21-26 for goal-setting, item 27-43 for strategy, item44-51 for assessment and item 52-58 for learning environment. (see table1)

Before these items were designed, the validity was considered carefully.Mativation includes extrinsic motivation and intrinsic motivation.Although we consider teachers’efforts to motivate students, we do believe that ultimately students should become selfmotivated.The survey claims that intrinsically motivated people do things for their own sake instead of external reward.Intrinsic motivation is strongly related to self-regulation, one element of autonomous learning.Motivation was investigated through rating scales of various kinds of their attitude toward the language, the culture, and the learning process.The questions were mainly concerned with intrinsic motivation, such as“I am interested in English”, “I like to communicate with others in English”, “I think learning English is challenging and interesting”.

The items for learning content involve resources in class and outside.Here I suppose what students learn is determined by learners rather than their teachers.

The items for goal-setting and study plan are concerned with planning, time management.Goal-setting means that students set their learning objectives on their own.

The items for strategy mainly consist of listening, speaking, reading, writing, memory and other learning strategies.

The items for assessment include self-regulation, self-summary, self-assessment and self-reinforcement.

The items for help include physical environment and school culture.It showed how students get help from teachers, peers and other resources.

3.3 Results of the research and findings

3.3.1 Data analysis

3.3.1.1 Correlation between different variables

The questionnaire was divided into six parts in order to test its reliability.Correlation analysis was used to test the relationships between different variables.Through calculation by the software SPSS 13, the reliabilities between the six dimensions range from0.770 to 0.961, which proved that the questionnaire was reliable and these six aspects were highly consistent.We can use it to identify the level of autonomous learning in Foreign Language Department of Ding xi Teachers College.As shown in Table 2, a close relation existed between the 6 variables of autonomous learning.Help had the strongest correlation with Assess.

3.3.1.2 Levels of autonomy

Means and standard deviations of the learner autonomy in English learning on each aspect are described in Table 3.Most of the means are nearly half of the total.That means students didn’t have high level of autonomous learning.Of all the components, college students showed the lowest degree in assessing.The standard deviation is one of the most important statistical measures.It shows the typical amount by which values in the data differ from the mean.From the table we can see standard deviation of strategy is the highest and then comes motivation.All the standard deviation were big, which may be due to fact that students graduate from different middle schools.

3.3.1.3 The relation between autonomy level and English achievement

In order to answer the second question, college students were divided into two parts in terms of the scores in College Entrance Examination, high-achievers are above the average score while the others are low-achievers.

The description of the levels of autonomy in high-achieving learners and low-achieving learners. (N1=51, N2=51)

The data indicates that high-achievers are significantly superior to the low-achieving ones in the overall level of autonomy.The autonomy in all the components is significantly related to learner achievement.

3.3.1.4 The differences in the level of autonomy between female students and male students

M1=mean of autonomy in high-achieving learnersM2=mean of autonomy in low-achieving learnersS1=standard variation in high-achieving learnersS2=standard variation in low-achieving learners

In order to answer the third question, college students were divided into two parts, male students and female students. (N1=78, N2=24)

M1=mean of autonomy in male learnersM2=mean of autonomy in female learnersS1=standard variation in male learnersS2=standard variation in female learnersThe data shows that there are no significan

The data shows that there are no significant differences between male and female students (p>0.1) .But the autonomy of females in almost all the components except content was superior to males.

3.3.2 Classroom observation

Good learners were actively involved in classroom activities.They took notes when necessary and listened to the teacher inventively.They willingly and actively answer questions and think for themselves.In spoken English activities, they actively expressed their ideas and tried to use newly-learned words, phrases and sentences patterns.They seemed to have a strong desire to communicate, or learn from communication.They made up their own sentences instead of referring to the ones on the textbook.They were not afraid to make mistakes.If they had questions which could not be solved by themselves, they didn’t hesitate to ask for help.They took the initiative to speak in class.On the contrary, low-achieving students were tired of English.They tended to prefer written work, such as grammar and other written exercises.In class, they seldom took notes.Some of them don’t know what to take because their middle school teachers often told them what they needed to write down, but in college, it all depended on themselves.They were unwilling to answer questions unless asked to do so.If they had to do some presentations, they often read the original words in the books.Though they sometimes talked with their partners, they sometimes speak Chinese instead of English.

In reading, good learners did better than less successful students.They could take advantage of reading strategies well, such as scanning, skimming and guessing unfamiliar words from the context and find topic sentences easily.However low-achieving students couldn’t finish material in the limited time.Some of them even moved their fingers or pens while reading.They focused on words rather than meanings.

In writing, high-achieving students often wrote outlines first.They followed the teachers’requirements and directions of the training materials.After writing, they often checked their own assignments and sometimes ask their peers to do so.But low-achieving students often ignore the writing requirements.In addition, they made many grammatical mistakes in the sentences and submitted to the teacher without checking.

Neither high-achieving students nor low-achievers cooperated with their classmates in class.Females did much better in speaking than males.Quite a few males were reluctant to speak English in class.In the other fields, there were no differences.

3.3.3 Interview

students were also asked to reflect their learning, which includes the following questions:

1.Do you have a study plan?

2.Are you active in class?

3.What activities do you undertake to learn English after class?

4.Why do you want to carry out such activities?

5.Are you attentive or absent-minded?

6.How do you carry out this activity?Do you use any methods?

A high-achieving student:I have study plans.In class, I am active because it is good for me to practice my English and keep myself alert.I like reading English newspapers and magazines. (China Daily, 21stCentury, and English Salon) .They are too expensive.So I often read English books in our library.When I met new words, I guess their meanings.After reading, I look them up in the dictionary and write in my notebook.I like reading in the classroom.No one interrupt me there.I also like to speak English with my friends outside.I appreciate self-evaluation very much.

A low-achieving student:I don’t have a study plan.In class, I don’t like to answer the teachers’questions though sometimes I know the answers.I want to read some English materials outside class.But there are too many new words.I had to give up.Speak English?No chance.

3.4 Discussion

On the basis of the data analysis, we can conclude the level of autonomy has a significant relation to learner English achievement.The over mean of autonomy in high-achieving learners are higher than that means of autonomy in low-achieving learners.What made them different?

Motivation

It is admitted that motivation is highly correlated to achievement, and this correlation is taken as evidence that highly motivated students do well in school and outside of school.The relationship may be in the opposite direction from that which is commonly assumed.That is, it may be superior achievement that enhances motivation as well as high motivation leading to superior performance.57%of low-achieving learners choose“they are never or seldom interested in English”and“only 10%of them like to communicate with others in English.”while 62%high-achievers say they are interested in English and 71%of them like to communicate with others in English.

There are two types of motivation, extrinsic and intrinsic.When the only reason for performing an act is to gain something outside the activity itself, such as passing an exam, or getting financial rewards, the motivation is likely to be extrinsic.When the experience of doing something generate interest and enjoyment, and the reason for performing the activity lie within the activity itself, then the motivation is likely to be intrinsic.Although both extrinsic and intrinsic motivations play an important role in learning, here intrinsic motivation is mainly dealt with and autonomous learners are self-motivated.Maslow (1970) claimed that intrinsic motivation is clearly superior to extrinsic.One of the most effective ways to help both child and adults to think and learn is to free them from the control of rewards and punishments.It was found that students who were interested in continuing their study beyond the college entrance requirement were positively and intrinsically motivated to succeed.In contrast, those who were only in the class to fulfill entrance requirement exhibited low motivation and weaker performance.

Learner level is likely to be one factor governing how important this type of attitude might be.It is possible that at the advanced level attitude towards the reference group will be more important than lower down.At the advanced stage getting inside the culture is more important.If the learners are interested in the target language community’s culture, custom, media and so on, it is more probable that they possess intrinsic motivation.It is also accepted that intrinsic motivation with long-term benefit and extrinsic motivation with short-term benefits.

The study of motivation also raises the interesting‘chick and egg’issue of cause and effect.Motivation may also lead to success;but success can also lead to motivation.

From the data, we can also see female students have a little higher motivation level in English.First it may be because girls have stronger competence in language learning.Second, maybe females are under pressure in education and employment.

4 Conclusion

In the thesis, I made a survey on learners’autonomy in English learning in Foreign Language Department of Ding xi Teachers College.The survey was based on the autonomous learning.I mainly focus on the understanding what autonomous learning means, including its definition, its characteristics and theoretical background.Then I use interview, classroom observation, questionnaire survey to explore the level of autonomy, the relation between the level of autonomy and English achievement, and the difference between male students and female students.At last, I point out one main cause which influences the level of autonomous in learning English.The survey showed that the level of autonomy in Foreign Language Department of Ding xi Teachers College is low and significantly correlated to academic performance.In general, there is no significant difference between male students and female students, but in motivation, female students are higher.By writing the thesis, I hope I can provide some useful information so that the teachers in our school know their students well about their autonomy in English learning, and help their students learn English actively and autonomously.

Though I have tried my best to ensure reliability and validity of the survey, due to my limited knowledge and current conditions unsolved, the present paper still needs improving.In the terms of methods, questionnaires may cover more aspects.Moreover, the subjects were chosen only 4 classes of freshmen in our school, which might affect its representative.Nevertheless, this paper describes what is actually going on in our EL classroom.It is expected that the result of the survey will benefit both teachers and students.

参考文献

[1]Andrew D Cohen.Strategies in Learning and using a Second Language[M].Addision Wesley Longman Limited, 1998.

[2]Cotterall S.Developing a course strategy for learner autonomy[J].ELT Journal, 1995, 49 (3) :219-227.

[3]Cotterall S.Promoting Learner Autonomy Through The Curricu lum:Principles for designing language courses[J].ELT Journal, 2000, 54 (2) :109-117.

[4]Dickinson L.Self-instruction in language learning[M].Cam bridge:Cambridge University Press, 1987.

[5]Ho J, Crookall D.Breaking with Chinese cultural traditions:Learner autonomy in English language teaching[J].System, 1995, 23 (2) :235-243.

商务英语专业英文简历表格 篇3

关键词：商务方向；教学方法；英文外贸函电

一、 商务英语方向的特点

随着经济全球化并且我国加入世界贸易组织，国际商务活动发展日益蓬勃，国际贸易往来也变得日益频繁，因此为了迎合社会对商务人才的需求，绝大多数高校的英语专业划分了商务英语方向，教学目标从培养学生掌握纯英语语言技能升级为使学生成为“英语+外贸知识”的复合型人才。而英文外贸函电是商务方向学生的一门理论结合实践的必修课程。

然而，这一课程的学习需要以多门先修课程为基础，如国际贸易实务，商务英语谈判，甚至是外贸跟单等，所以在讲授上，一般放在最后一个学年甚至是最后一个学期，而这样的安排会产生一系列问题，最突出的就是课时缩水。由于商务方向一般从大三才开始划分，这便不同于商务英语和国际贸易专业的学生可以从大一便能够详细学习外贸的各个分支及流程，并且商务方向的学生在最后一个学期会面临实习及就业等问题，所以不同于国际贸易实务等相对基础的课程，函电课程的课时一般不会超过32节，这就给讲练结合的教学形式增加了难度。再者，在有限的时间内，如何让选择商务方向的学生像商务英语专业的学生一样系统并详尽地学到外贸函电的相关知识，并在特定的贸易环境中掌握独立撰写函电的能力，已经成为教学中需要深切探讨的课题。

二、 传统的教学方法的弊端

对于英文外贸函电这一课程来说，传统的教学方法不外乎以下几点：首先，教师利用三分之一的课时讲与单元内容相关的贸易背景知识和基本概念，然而由于这些知识学生在先修课程中已经学过，所以这个步骤实则是教师引导学生回顾的过程；其次，教师一般会告知学生这类函电的写作步骤及常用的句型，并讲解写作中的注意事项；再次，教师会以几篇范文为例，给学生具体地讲解其中的句法及常用语，并根据范文内容引导学生牢记写作步骤；最后，教师提出写作要求让学生练习独立撰写。

然而上述传统的教学方法，针对商务方向的学生有几个明显的弊端。第一，与商务英语专业的学生不同，商务英语方向的学生一般从大三才开始接触商务英语的相关概念，知识的理解上缺少一个潜移默化的过程，致使学生无法深刻领悟其中含义，因此函电教师再次提及这些概念的时候，很多学生只记得学过但不记得具体含义，所以，这一回顾背景知识的过程多为教师唱独角戏，互动性不强，再者学生对枯燥的理论讲授过程会存有倦怠感，并且这一步骤教师是全英授课，对学生本身的英语语言技能就是一个考验，若学生不能全心投入到教师的思路中来，便会与整个教学环节脱轨。第二，通过范文讲授函电常用语句，学生无法系统的记忆，只能针对范文中提到的内容做零星的记忆，学生想要进行知识的整合和梳理往往难寻头绪。第三，做练习这一步骤是问题最突出的，笔者在上文提到商务方向函电这一课程的课时不会很充裕，因此给学生设定贸易环境让学生撰写函电这一传统的写作练习环节可能产生两个后果：其一，学生草草写完，教师没有时间仔细阅读并整理出其中普遍存在的问题并在课上帮学生纠正，反而只能随意以几名学生的电函为例来评价并讲解问题所在，这样的教学活动受众面较小，大多数学生会抱着不会选到自己的侥幸心理不认真对待这一写作过程。而若教师给学生充足的时间写，课后统一收上来批改，就会产生第二个后果，即课堂时间的利用效率降低。课堂九十分钟，所有学生都想从老师那里学到课本上没有的知识，若教师空出近乎三分之一的课堂时间给学生自己运用，课堂活动的安排会变得虎头蛇尾，学生也会觉得知识的汲取供不应求。

因此根据笔者近几年的教学经验，针对英语专业商务方向外贸函电课程的特点，探索出以下教学方法。

三、推荐使用的教学方法

1.以完整的贸易流程为框架，让学生系统的的了解贸易往来中各环节函电的撰写方法。

针对英语专业商务英语方向函电课程课时量不够充足这一点，教师应对所规定教材的教学内容做适当取舍，在制作教学大纲时就应确定，着重讲授的部分应该和贸易流程中重点环节相关联。比如说，一次完整的贸易往来可以分为五大步骤：贸易的准备，贸易的磋商，合同的签署，贸易的执行以及贸易的善后。其中每步下面可由一些分支构成，如贸易的准备包括建立贸易关系及资信调查；贸易的磋商较为复杂，包括询盘，报盘，还盘，订单及订单的确认等；合同的签署包括合同的写法，常用语，及销售确认书等；贸易的执行一般包括支付方式，包装，运输，保险；贸易的善后问题中最重要的是申诉，索赔和理赔。此外如果时间允许，还可以填充促销，代理，投标等内容。有了这一框架，再和教材中的内容灵活地一一对应起来，教学便可以系统化。但是，这还不是关键所在，重点是这些环节需要由一个具体的贸易实例填充并串联起来，此处可结合“商务模拟公司”教学法，比如模拟进口公司A，出口公司B，A需从B处进口一批纺织品，整个课程围绕着这两个公司的贸易往来展开，从二者如何建立贸易关系，到对纺织品的询盘报盘下订单，再到签订合同及后期的装运等问题，为学生讲授其中每一步的函电是如何撰写的，让学生对整个课程有一个整体的把握，不会顾此失彼。教材上的范文可以作为扩展阅读，并选出典型的让学生分析并评价用词是否得当，意思是否表达完整，培养学生的批判思维，因为批判思维对学生独立分析问题的能力起积极推进的作用。

2.教学中教师应擅于归纳函电用语并引导学生牢记写作步骤。

为了避免学生对函电常用语记忆零散这一问题，教师应阶段性的帮学生总结意思相似的语句，如达成交易可以用complete a transaction， conclude a business 或close business等词语表达；又如在函电或合同中出现hereby一词，教师应帮学生总结here， there， where 加介词的规律。另外，教师引导学生牢记写作步骤是传统函电教学法的延续，学生对每一类函电的写作步骤烂熟于心是他们在以后的工作岗位上业务操作熟练程度的有力证明。例如当学生得知要写一篇还盘函，头脑中需清楚地呈现出如下几步：对卖主报盘表示感谢；对不能接受对方报盘表示遗憾并告知原因；做还盘，提出建议；期望建议被采纳并渴望得到早日回复。学生在撰写函电时严格遵循写作步骤的策略性和完整性，对两个公司建立和维系长期的友好互利的贸易关系起到促进作用。

3.构建翻译与实训相结合的练习模式

针对上文提及的写作练习环节教学设计所面临的困境，最好的方法是构建翻译与实训相结合的练习模式。函电课程的定位应侧重于写作实践，而对于商务英语方向的学生来说，在有限的时间内提高写作练习的效率，通过练习巩固写作步骤及句型，并使信函的传情达意严谨得体，最基本的练习形式是翻译。教师可给出与课程相关的句子让学生运用课上所学进行口头的英汉互译，翻译是没有唯一标准答案的，学生在想方设法运用函电用语来翻译句子时，不仅巩固了所学的词语句型，无形中也锻炼了他们独立思考的能力。

教师随后给学生指定具体案例并把学生分为写信人及收信人两方，以不同的角度来进行函电的实训。比如一方撰写订单函，另一方写回绝订单函，两组学生可以自由选取翻译练习中的句子用在自己的信函中，也可组织其他的语句使函电步骤完整，内容充实，每个组的组员分工明确，通过讨论和记录整理出两三篇同一主题的信函即可。这样的设计使学生在身临其境的紧迫感的驱使下更加深刻的理解相关的贸易操作流程，提高独立撰写函电的能力，因为在通过函电进行磋商的过程中，掌握较差的一方所处的劣势很容易展露出来，这样一来学生的竞争意识会化作他们的学习动力。另外，实训中的函电可以用之前已经翻译过的句子来构建，这就把两个环节融为一体，大大节省了练习时间。再者，每人都参与思考但不是每人都写，这使学生操作过程中出现的普遍问题更容易整理，也为教师集中点评争取了时间。

然而这些方法，需要教师在课前多花一些时间和精力搜集大量的操作性强并结合实际的案例，归纳与案例相关的句子及用语，并要求教师对整个课程的脉络有一个宏观的把握，并清楚地认识其中每个分支间的内部联系。因此，关于外贸函电这门必须把理论和实践结合起来的课程，它的教学方法是深值广大英语专业商务方向教学工作者探究的。

参考文献

1.王玮韦.外贸函电实训教学模式研究[J].长江大学学报，2011（10）

2.吴金凤.商务模拟公司教学法在贸易函电实训中的运用[J].科技信息，2011（3）

日语专业英文简历表格 篇4